Distributed harmonic patterns of structure-function dependence orchestrate human consciousness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A central question in neuroscience is how consciousness arises from the dynamic interplay of brain structure and function. Departing from the predominant location- centric view in neuroimaging, here we provide an alternative perspective on the neural signatures of human consciousness: one that is intrinsically centered on how the distributed network architecture of the human structural connectome shapes functional activation across scales. We decompose cortical dynamics of resting-state functional MRI into fundamental distributed patterns of structure- function association: the harmonic modes of the human structural connectome. We contrast wakefulness with a wide spectrum of states of consciousness, spanning chronic disorders of consciousness but also pharmacological perturbations of consciousness induced with the anaesthetic propofol and the psychoactive drugs ketamine and LSD. Decomposing this wide spectrum of states of consciousness in terms of “connectome harmonics” reveals a generalisable structure-function signature of loss of consciousness, whether due to anaesthesia or brain injury. A mirror-reverse of this harmonic signature characterises the altered state induced by LSD or ketamine, reflecting psychedelic-induced decoupling of brain function from structure. The topology and neuroanatomy of the human connectome are crucial for shaping the repertoire of connectome harmonics into a fine-tuned indicator of consciousness, correlating with physiological and subjective scores across datasets and capable of discriminating between behaviourally indistinguishable sub-categories of brain-injured patients, tracking the presence of covert consciousness. Overall, connectome harmonic decomposition identifies meaningful relationships between neurobiology, brain function, and conscious experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".