Bibliographic record
Abstract
We applaud the authors for incorporating the use of difficult airway bracelets into their practice and sharing this information through their editorial.1 Bracelets and wristbands have been used and are considered standard of care for identification and other types of alerts, such as patient allergy, do not resuscitate (DNR) status, and fall risk, but have not been widely adopted for difficult airway. Alert bracelets have the advantage of traveling with the patient and are clearly visible during an emergency, when there may not be time to access the patient record. The comprehensive difficult airway program at Johns Hopkins introduced difficult airway bracelets in 1996 and the alert bracelets have been in use since.2 In addition to the alert bracelets, an alert was created for the electronic patient record to clearly identify patients with a known difficult airway. Any patient with an electronic alert or who experienced a difficult intubation received a bracelet that was worn throughout their patient stay. Most electronic records allow for the creation of alerts that appear at the top of the computer screen, and we encourage departments to include a difficult airway alert as an option. The Medic Alert Foundation provides medic alert ID bracelets that are widely recognized as well as registries for patients, which include difficult intubation. Especially during the coronavirus disease (COVID) pandemic, with the increased risk of unplanned extubation and possible need for emergent reintubation, clear dissemination of information about previous difficult intubation is very important, not only due to the increased morbidity risk to the patient, but also because of potential increased aerosol exposure risk to the airway provider during emergent airway management.3 Airway alerts in the electronic medical record and alert bracelets are important steps to disseminate this vital information. Several international airway societies, including the American Society for Anesthesiologists, the Society for Airway Management, the Difficult Airway Society, and the Canadian Airway Focus Group Difficult Airway Society, recommend the use of difficult airway bracelets. These societies recommend, in addition to alert bracelets, electronic medical record documentation and chart flags, written letters to the patient, and the use of airway registries to disseminate difficult airway information.4 This will allow tracking and communication, not only during the acute hospital stay, but after discharge as well and for any future hospitalizations. During the COVID pandemic, identification of a previous difficult intubation at the time of admission would allow early recognition and planning for airway management and potentially reduce both patient and provider risk. Lauren Berkow, MD, FASAUniversity of Florida College of MedicineGainesville, Florida[email protected]Arthur Kanowitz, MD, FACEPAirway Safety MovementHighlands Ranch, Colorado
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.363 | 0.213 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".