Bearing capacity mechanisms for pipes buried in sand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents results of scaled physical model tests performed to measure the reaction developing on a rigid pipe buried in dry sand when the pipe is subjected to vertical downwards movement relative to its surrounding soil. The aim of this experimental study is to evaluate the efficacy of methods used to determine the properties of vertical bearing springs, an integral part of beam-on-nonlinear Winkler spring models used for the analysis of buried pipelines subjected to permanent ground displacements. We show that bearing capacity formulas used in practice to estimate the ultimate reaction developing on buried pipes may provide reasonably accurate estimates, provided that they are used together with sand friction angle values that account for the fact that granular materials do not obey an associative flow rule, and with bearing capacity factors compatible with the mode of sand failure observed in the tests. We also provide evidence suggesting that laying pipes in loose sand backfills does not have a beneficial effect on the reaction developing on the pipe, compared to medium dense sand, and we recommend against using loose sand material properties for the estimation of the properties of vertical bearing springs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".