MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048704129 · doi:10.3233/jifs-200374

An approximation algorithm for solving standard quadratic optimization problems

2020· article· en· W3048704129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityConestoga College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemidefinite programmingAlgorithmComputational complexity theoryMathematicsLinear programmingApproximation algorithmHeuristicMathematical optimizationQuadratic programmingMatrix (chemical analysis)Quadratic equationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Standard quadratic optimization problems (StQPs) are NP-hard in computational complexity theory when the matrix is indefinite. This paper describes an approximate algorithm of finding inner optimal values of StQPs. The approximate algorithm fuzzifies variable x ∈ R n with normalized possibility distributions and simplifies the solving of StQPs. The approximation ratio is discussed and determined. Numerical results show that (1) the new algorithm achieves higher accuracy than the semidefinite programming method and linear programming approximation method; (2) the novel algorithm consumes less than one out of fourth computational time that is consumed by linear programming approximation method; (3) the computational time of the new algorithm does not correlate with the matrix densities whereas the computational times of the branch-and-bound and heuristic algorithms do.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it