MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impacto da capsaicina (pimenta vermelha) na deglutição de indivíduos com Doença de Parkinson

2019· dissertation· pt· W3048724097 on OpenAlexaff
Luana Oliveira Abreu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDysphagia Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sem dúvida já lhes perguntaram muitas vezes para que serve a matemática, e se essas delicadas construções que tiramos inteiras de nosso espírito não são artificiais, concebidas por nosso capricho.Entre as pessoas que fazem essa pergunta, devo fazer uma distinção; as pessoas práticas reclamam de nós apenas um meio de ganhar dinheiro.Estes não merecem resposta; é a eles, antes, que conviria perguntar para que serve acumular tantas riquezas e se, para ter tempo de adquiri-las, é preciso negligenciar a arte e a ciência, as únicas que podem nos proporcionar espíritos capazes de usufruí-las, et propervitam vivendi perderecausas."Henri PoincaréAGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço primeiramente à Deus por ter estado ao meu lado me nutrindo de força e fé para superar os obstáculos e momentos de dificuldade que se apresentaram.Ao Prof. Dr. Roberto Oliveira Dantas pela generosidade, respeito, atenção e paciência apresentadas em todos os momentos que precisei.Aos meus pais Matildes e Gilberto.Aos amigos anônimos que na correria me ajudaram a resolver questões pendentes, encontrar uma sala perdida nos corredores do hospital ou do departamento de farmácia sem ao menos saber o meu nome, pelo puro e sincero desejo de ajudar.Não esquecerei o rosto de nenhum de vocês.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDysphagia Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207