A GNSS-FREE UNMANNED AERIAL LASER SCANNING SYSTEM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. In this paper, the procedure of developing and evaluating a UAV-borne mapping system is described. The system is equipped with both a LiDAR and a camera. The system mounting parameters, as well as the intrinsic parameters of the individual sensors, are calibrated rigorously. Simultaneous calibration of the LiDAR intrinsic parameters and the LiDAR-camera mounting parameters is performed in a self-calibrating bundle adjustment with additional relative orientation constraints. A visual-inertial approach is proposed to georeference the laser scans without using a GNSS receiver. This approach is motivated not only by the interest of users in low-cost systems but also by the fact that the integrity of GNSS signals might be affected under several environmental conditions, e.g., indoors, in urban canyons, under tree canopies. It is shown that a low-cost inertial measurement unit not equipped with a dual-frequency, real-time kinematic GNSS receiver is still useful for georeferencing the laser scanning data with cm-level accuracy. The scans are also textured using the images captured by the camera, which enriches the LiDAR point clouds with spectral information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".