MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048826181 · doi:10.1190/geo2020-0088.1

3D finite-volume time-domain modeling of geophysical electromagnetic data on unstructured grids using potentials

2020· article· en· W3048826181 on OpenAlexafffund
Xushan Lu, Colin G. Farquharson

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsScalar potentialMagnetic potentialFinite volume methodHelmholtz equationElectric fieldElectromagnetic fieldCharge conservationElectric-field integral equationPhysicsTime domainScalar (mathematics)Maxwell's equationsComputer scienceMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsPartial differential equationMagnetic fieldGeometryMechanicsMathematicsBoundary value problemCharge (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Unstructured grids are capable of faithfully representing real-life geologic models and topography with relatively few mesh cells. We have developed a finite-volume solution to the 3D time-domain electromagnetic forward modeling problems using unstructured Delaunay-Voronoï dual meshes. We consider the Helmholtz equation for the electric field and a combination of the Helmholtz equation and the conservation of charge equation for the magnetic vector (A) and electric scalar (ϕ) potentials. The A−ϕ formulation requires initial values for A that can be obtained by solving the magnetostatic problem. We use backward Euler time stepping to advance the electric field and the potentials in the time domain. When using the potential method, the electric and magnetic fields are calculated from A−ϕ solutions. To obtain consistent potential solutions at different time steps, we enforce the Coulomb gauge condition, using implicit and explicit methods. We validate the proposed method with a simple 3D conductive block model and with a comparison with other numerical methods. By using A−ϕ potentials, it is possible to decompose the electric field into galvanic and inductive parts, which is helpful in understanding the physics behind the behavior of the electromagnetic fields in the ground. We use vector plots to visualize the decomposed electric fields for horizontal and vertical thin conductor models with inductive loop sources. This allows the interplay between inductive and galvanic parts as the electric field and current density develop with time to be visualized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207