MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048870206 · doi:10.1364/ome.402185

Nanoporous SiO<sub>2</sub> based on annealed artificial opals as a favorable material platform of terahertz optics

2020· article· en· W3048870206 on OpenAlexfundno aff
V. E. Ulitko, Arsen K. Zotov, Arsenii A. Gavdush, Gleb M. Katyba, G. A. Komandin, I. E. Spektor, I. M. Shmytko, G. A. Emeľchenko, Irina N. Dolganova, Maksim Skorobogatiy, В. Н. Курлов, В. М. Масалов, Kirill I. Zaytsev

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Materials Express · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRussian Science FoundationCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanoporousTerahertz radiationRefractive indexAnnealing (glass)Attenuation coefficientPorosityOpticsOptoelectronicsComposite materialNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, artificial opals, made of 300-nm-diameter nanoporous SiO2 globules by sedimentation of a colloidal suspension and annealing at different temperatures in the range of 200–1500 °C, are studied as a promising material platform for terahertz (THz) optics. Our findings reveal that THz optical properties of such materials can be predictably varied in a wide range by annealing, while being a deterministic function of the material porosity. Thus, when increasing annealing temperature, the resultant material refractive index increases from 1.65 to 1.95 at 1.0 THz, while the material absorption coefficient (by field) reduces from 10 to 1 cm−1. The Bruggeman effective medium theory was then successfully applied to model optical properties of the nanoporous SiO2 at THz frequencies as a function of the material porosity and the annealing temperature. Finally, bulk nanoporous SiO2 were shaped using conventional grinding techniques into plates and cylindrical lenses to demonstrate robustness of the novel THz optical materials. A wide range of the nanoporous SiO2 refractive indices, their low-to-moderate THz-wave absorption, as well as their mechanical robustness make such materials a promising platform for THz optics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptical Materials ExpressSame topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207