MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048885206 · doi:10.1002/acn3.51151

Neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease is genetically heterogeneous

2020· article· en· W3048885206 on OpenAlexaff
Zhongbo Chen, Wai Yan Yau, Zane Jaunmuktane, Arianna Tucci, Prasanth Sivakumar, Sarah A. Gagliano Taliun, Chris Turner, Stéphanie Efthymiou, Kristina Ibáñez, Roisin Sullivan, Farah Bibi, Alkyoni Athanasiou‐Fragkouli, Thomas Bourinaris, David Zhang, Tamás Révész, Tammaryn Lashley, Michael DeTure, Dennis W. Dickson, Keith A. Josephs, Ellen Gelpí, Gábor G. Kovács, Glenda M. Halliday, Dominic B. Rowe, Ian P. Blair, Pentti J. Tienari, Anu Suomalainen, Nick C. Fox, Nicholas Wood, Andrew J. Lees, Matti Haltia, John Hardy, Mina Ryten, Jana Vandrovcová, Henry Houlden

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersRosetrees TrustUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustAtaxia UKParkinson's UKDepartment of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchBrain Research UKUCLH Biomedical Research CentreCancer Research UKWellcome TrustMedical Research CouncilWellcome
KeywordsEosinophilicDiseaseMedicineGenomePathologyPathologicalIn silicoHaplotypeInclusion bodiesTrinucleotide repeat expansionGeneticsGeneBiologyAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease (NIID) is a clinically heterogeneous neurodegenerative condition characterized by pathological intranuclear eosinophilic inclusions. A CGG repeat expansion in NOTCH2NLC was recently identified to be associated with NIID in patients of Japanese descent. We screened pathologically confirmed European NIID, cases of neurodegenerative disease with intranuclear inclusions and applied in silico-based screening using whole-genome sequencing data from 20 536 participants in the 100 000 Genomes Project. We identified a single European case harbouring the pathogenic repeat expansion with a distinct haplotype structure. Thus, we propose new diagnostic criteria as European NIID represents a distinct disease entity from East Asian cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Clinical and Translational NeurologySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207