MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048891607 · doi:10.1016/j.jmii.2020.07.016

Clinical impact of recreational drug use among people living with HIV in southern Taiwan

2020· article· en· W3048891607 on OpenAlexaff
Guanlin Chen, Shang‐Yi Lin, Hsiang-Yi Lo, Hsaing-Chun Wu, Ya-Mei Lin, Tun‐Chieh Chen, Chieh-Yu Sandy Chu, Wen-Chi Lee, Yen‐Hsu Chen, Po‐Liang Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV-related health complications and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersKaohsiung Medical University
KeywordsMedicineRecreational drug useRecreational DrugDrugPillOdds ratioRecreationInternal medicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: It is unclear about the impact of recreational drug use on the adherence, drug-drug interaction and the occurrence of sexual transmitted diseases (STDs) among people living with HIV. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between Dec 2016, and July 2018 to assess the clinical impact of recreational drug consumption in people living with HIV with antiretroviral therapy. We collected data of the demographics, recreational drug use, laboratory results and STDs diagnoses. Potential drug-drug interactions were checked with reference databases. The association between recreational drug use and STDs, HIV viral load suppression and drug interactions were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 462 participants were enrolled, included 384 recreational drug users and 78 non-recreational drug users. Younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.98; p = 0.001), longer HIV infection period (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI: 1.03-1.20; p = 0.009) and poor antiretroviral drug adherence (1-2 pills missing per month: aOR, 6.82; 95% CI: 3.50-13.27; p < 0.001; >2 pills missing per month: aOR, 3.50; 95% CI: 1.28-9.61; p = 0.015) were factors associated with recreational drug use. Methamphetamine and nitrites were two most common recreational drugs. Recreational drug use was significantly associated with STDs in one-year follow-up period (aOR, 2.43; 95% CI: 1.11-5.32; p = 0.027) but was not significantly associated with unsuppressed viral load, though a trend was observed (OR, 2.23; 95% CI: 0.92-5.37; p = 0.074). Potential interactions with recreational drugs included 33.1% antiretroviral drugs and 31.3% medications for comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Recreational drug was associated with STDs. A great proportion of the patients consuming recreational drugs had potential interactions with antiretroviral drugs and medications for comorbidities. The association of recreational drug use and unsuppressed viral load warrants further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Microbiology Immunology and InfectionSame topicHIV-related health complications and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207