MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048896729 · doi:10.5121/ijaia.2020.11405

Log Message Anomaly Detection with Oversampling

2020· article· en· W3048896729 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Farzad, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Applications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOversamplingAnomaly detectionAnomaly (physics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligencePhysicsComputer networkBandwidth (computing)Condensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Imbalanced data is a significant challenge in classification with machine learning algorithms. This is particularly important with log message data as negative logs are sparse so this data is typically imbalanced. In this paper, a model to generate text log messages is proposed which employs a SeqGAN network. An Autoencoder is used for feature extraction and anomaly detection is done using a GRU network. The proposed model is evaluated with three imbalanced log data sets, namely BGL, OpenStack, and Thunderbird. Results are presented which show that appropriate oversampling and data balancing improves anomaly detection accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Artificial Intelligence & ApplicationsSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207