MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3048978893 · doi:10.1038/s41477-020-0691-6

Reshaping the future of ethnobiology research after the COVID-19 pandemic

2020· article· en· W3048978893 on OpenAlexafffund
Ina Vandebroek, Andréa Pieroni, John Richard Stepp, Natália Hanazaki, Ana H. Ladio, Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves, David Picking, Rupika Delgoda, Alfred Maroyi, Tinde van Andel, Cassandra L. Quave, Narel Y. Paniagua-Zambrana, Rainer W. Bussmann, Guillaume Odonne, Arshad Mehmood Abbasi, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque, Janelle Baker, Susan Kutz, Shrabya Timsina, Masayoshi Shigeta, Tacyana Pereira Ribeiro Oliveira, Julio Alberto Hurrell, Patricia Arenas, Jeremías P. Puentes, Jean Hugé, Yeter Yeşıl, Laurent Jean Pierre, Temesgen Magule Olango, Farid Dahdouh‐Guebas

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Plants · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAthabasca University
FundersFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of CalgarySchool of Medicine, Emory UniversityNaturalis Biodiversity CenterUniversidade Federal de PernambucoCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversidade Estadual da ParaíbaAthabasca UniversityUniversidad Nacional de La PlataUniversity of Fort HareInstitut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la MerUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasVrije Universiteit BrusselEmory UniversityHawassa UniversityYale University
KeywordsEthnobiologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pandemic2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Political scienceGeographyEnvironmental ethicsBiologyEcologyVirologyMedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations122
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature PlantsSame topicViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchFrench-language works237,207