A Dynamic Recovery Module for In-band Control Channel Failure In Software Defined Networking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Software Defined Networking (SDN) is a recently proposed networking pattern that facilitates a centralized system of computer networks where a controller maintains the management of a global view of the network. One of the characteristics of SDNs is that by decoupling the control and data plane from each other, the controllability and manageability of a network is improved. In this arrangement, the connections between the controller (control plane) and the switches (data plane) are established by either an in-band or an out-of-band control mechanism. Despite all the advantages of SDNs, new challenges arise regarding the connection availability between the data and control planes. A disconnection between the two planes could result in performance degradation. To achieve reliable control traffic between data and control planes, in this work, we design and implement an in-band control protection approach that finds a set of ideal paths for control channel, where as much control traffic as possible can be protected by the proposed protection mechanism. This design enables switches to locally react to failures without involving the controller. Through simulation experiments, we show that our proposed approach significantly improves the control reliability of an in-band control network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".