MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards an End-to-End Network Slicing Framework in Multi-Region Infrastructures

2020· article· en· W3049077163 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Lin, Simona Marinova, Alberto Leon‐Garcia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrchestrationComputer scienceEnd-to-end principleAgile software developmentEnd userWireless networkAdaptabilityNetwork architectureComputer networkVirtualizationDistributed computingWirelessTelecommunicationsCloud computingSoftware engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

End-to-end network slicing is a promising concept based on softwarization and virtualization, leading the way towards efficiently achieving the network and operational key performance indicators (KPIs) for future wireless systems that comprise softwarized network functions. It leverages the underlying physical infrastructure to create and orchestrate agile and programmable network functions which satisfy the end-to-end user demands. These features are crucial during situations in which sudden demand surges stress the wireless system. Proper network orchestration can provide the necessary and timely adaptability to offer sustained communication between end-users. This paper addresses the design and implementation of an end-to-end network slicing framework specifically designed to provide orchestration tools for softwarized network functions, in order to fulfill the system requirements for surge events such as flash crowds. The conducted performance evaluations demonstrate the applicability of this approach and validate the proof-of-concept implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207