MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049119636 · doi:10.7202/1070751ar

Mesure d’impact d’une variable binaire sur une réponse quantitative dans un cadre non paramétrique

2020· article· fr· W3049119636 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Auriol Wabo, Frédéric Planchet

Bibliographic record

VenueAssurances et gestion des risques · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMathematicsPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On propose dans cet article une méthode de quantification de l’effet d’une variable explicative qualitative sur une réponse quantitative plus souple à utiliser que le simple coefficient d’un modèle GLM multiplicatif ; l’objectif est de disposer d’une mesure ne nécessitant pas l’hypothèse de proportionnalité du GLM et complètement décorrélée de l’effet des autres variables explicatives incluses dans le modèle. L’approche est illustrée à l’aide de données de coûts de sinistres matériels automobiles, pour lesquelles on cherche à quantifier l’impact de l’expert qui a évalué le sinistre sur le montant de l’évaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAssurances et gestion des risquesSame topicExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)French-language works237,207