ANALISIS BENDUNGAN KERING (DRY DAM) CIAWI SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGENDALIAN BANJIR DKI JAKARTA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pembangunan Bendungan Kering (dry dam) Ciawi bertujuan sebagai upaya pengendalian banjir DKI Jakarta yang diakibatkan luapan air Sungai Ciliwung. Bendungan kering adalah bangunan bendung yang dibangun untuk mengkontrol banjir dengan membiarkan aliran sungai mengalir dengan bebas selama kondisi normal. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui reduksi banjir Sungai Ciliwung Hulu akibat dibangunnya Bendungan Kering Ciawi, dengan melakukan analisis hidrograf satuan sintetik (HSS) untuk mendapatkan hidrograf banjir rancangan dengan periode ulang 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, dan 100 tahun, setelah itu dilakukan analisis penelusuran banjir lewat waduk untuk mendapatkan reduksi banjir Sungai Ciliwung. Hasil perhitungan didapatkan Bendungan Ciawi dapat mereduksi banjir Sungai Ciliwung Hulu sebesar Q2 = 1,24%, Q5 = 14,12%, Q10 = 20,08%, Q25 = 26,81%, Q50 = 31,27%, dan Q100 = 35,33%. Hasil ini membuktikan dengan dibangunnya Bendungan Kering Ciawi dapat mereduksi banjir Sungai Ciliwung Hulu, sehingga diharapkan dapat mereduksi banjir di wilayah DKI Jakarta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it