Conduire l'évaluation des besoins en capacités fonctionnelles - Un guide pour les formateurs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce manuel sur l’évaluation des besoins en capacités fonctionnelles est destiné aux formateurs et a été produit dans le cadre du projet de Renforcement des capacités des systèmes d’innovation agricole (RC des SIA). Ce projet fait intervenir un partenariat mondial (Agrinatura, Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture [FAO] et des partenaires nationaux de huit pays pilotes) qui aspire à renforcer la capacité des pays et des acteurs clefs pour innover dans des systèmes agricoles complexes, améliorant ainsi les moyens de subsistance ruraux. Le RC des SIA reconnaît que l’innovation agricole est un processus qui est plus fructueux si ses acteurs sont dotés des capacités fonctionnelles qui leur permettront de faire face à la complexité, de collaborer, de réfléchir et d’apprendre et de s’engager dans des processus stratégiques et politiques (Cadre commun sur le Renforcement des capacités pour les systèmes d’innovation agricole, 2016).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".