MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Technology and equipment for underwater wet welding and cutting of high strength steel arctic structures using flux-cored wires<sup>*</sup>

2020· article· en· W3049236266 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutions123 Certification (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeldingMaterials scienceUnderwaterFlux (metallurgy)MetallurgyComposite materialGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The paper describes the experimental findings of underwater wet welding and cutting of API X70 pipe steel and plates with the use of the following flux-cored wires: TiO 2 -CaF 2 ; Fe 2 O 3 -TiO 2 and Fe 2 O 3 -TiO 2 -SiO 2 . For cutting the cored wire with a diameter of 2 mm based on salts of iron and alkali metals was developed. The best weld properties have been achieved during the underwater welding with fluoride flux-cored wires with TiO 2 -CaF 2 system, which provides the suitable micro structure of the weld, high solidity of deposited metal and mechanical properties of the weld. The use of flux-cored wire improves a quality of underwater wet cutting of steel plates with thickness up to 8 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it