MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049239202 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237238

A static VM placement and hybrid job scheduling model for green data centers

2020· article· en· W3049239202 on OpenAlexaff
Zahra Movahedi Nia, Mohammad Reza Khayyambashi, Ali Miri

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersUniversity of Isfahan
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy consumptionScheduling (production processes)QueueVirtual machineDistributed computingQuality of serviceEfficient energy useJob queueService-level agreementLive migrationJob schedulerMathematical optimizationComputer networkVirtualizationOperating systemCloud computingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reducing energy consumption has become a critical issue in today data centers. Reducing the number of required physical and Virtual Machines results in energy-efficiency. In this paper, to avoid the disadvantages of VM migration, a static VM placement algorithm is proposed which places VMs on hosts in a Worst-Fit-Decreasing (WFD) fashion. To reduce energy consumption further, the effect of job scheduling policy on the number of VMs needed for maintaining QoS requirements is studied. Each VM is modeled by an M/M/* queue in space-shared, time-shared, and hybrid job scheduling policies, and energy consumption of real-time as well as non-real-time applications is analyzed. Numerical results show that the hybrid policy outperforms space-shared and time-shared policies, in terms of energy consumption as well as Service Level Agreement (SLA) violations. Moreover, our non-migration method outperforms three different algorithms which use VM migration, in terms of reducing both energy consumption and SLA Violations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207