MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Ab Initio</i> Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Matrix Elements for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Ge</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>, and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Se</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2021· article· lv· W3049241883 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Belley, Charlie Payne, S. R. Stroberg, T. Miyagi, J. D. Holt

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMF
FundersNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Canada Research GridNational Research Council CanadaCompute CanadaTRIUMFU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsDouble beta decayPhysicsBETA (programming language)Matrix (chemical analysis)Valence (chemistry)Ab initioNuclear physicsParticle physicsNeutrinoQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We calculate basis-space converged neutrinoless $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay nuclear matrix elements for the lightest candidates: $^{48}\mathrm{Ca}$, $^{76}\mathrm{Ge}$, and $^{82}\mathrm{Se}$. Starting from initial two- and three-nucleon forces, we apply the ab initio in-medium similarity renormalization group to construct valence-space Hamiltonians and consistently transformed $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$-decay operators. We find that the tensor component is non-negligible in $^{76}\mathrm{Ge}$ and $^{82}\mathrm{Se}$, and the resulting nuclear matrix elements are overall 25%--45% smaller than those obtained from the phenomenological shell model. While a final matrix element with uncertainties still requires substantial developments, this work nevertheless opens a path toward a true first-principles calculation of neutrinoless $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay in all nuclei relevant for ongoing large-scale searches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3410.146

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207