Functional mapping of androgen receptor enhancer activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Androgen receptor (AR) is critical to the initiation, growth and progression of almost all prostate cancers. Once activated, the AR binds to cis -regulatory enhancer elements on DNA that drive gene expression. Yet, there are 10-100x more binding sites than differentially expressed genes. It still remains unclear how individual sites contribute to AR-mediated transcription. While descriptive functional genomic approaches broadly correlate with enhancer activity, they do not provide the locus-specific resolution needed to delineate the underlying regulatory logic of AR-mediated transcription. Therefore, we functionally tested all commonly occuring clinical AR binding sites with Self-Transcribing Active Regulatory Regions sequencing (STARRseq) to generate the first map of intrinsic AR enhancer activity. This approach is not significantly affected by endogenous chromatin modifications and measures the potential enhancer activity at each cis -regulatory element. Interestingly we found that only 7% of AR binding sites displayed increased enhancer activity upon hormonal stimulation. Instead, the vast majority of AR binding sites were either inactive (81%) or constitutively active enhancers (11%). These annotations strongly correlated with enhancer-associated features in both cell line and clinical prostate cancer. With these validated annotations we next investigated the effect of each enhancer class on transcription and found that AR-driven inducible enhancers frequently interacted with promoters, forming central chromosomal loops critical for gene transcription. We demonstrated that these inducible enhancers act as regulatory hubs that increase contacts with both other AR binding sites and gene promoters. This functional map was used to identify a somatic mutation that significantly reduces the expression of a commonly mutated AR-regulated tumour suppressor. Together, our data reveal a complex interplay between different AR binding sites that work in a highly coordinated manner to drive gene transcription.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".