MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049274597 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000021242

The effect of scalp electroacupuncture combined with Memantine in patients with vascular dementia

2020· article· en· W3049274597 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ai-Xia Yue, Xiuqing Han, Enxia Mao, Guangling Wu, Junxiang Gao, Liping Huang, Bin Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineElectroacupunctureMontreal Cognitive AssessmentVascular dementiaScalpDementiaMemantineInternal medicineQuality of life (healthcare)Nitric oxideAnesthesiaSuperoxide dismutaseAcupunctureSurgeryOxidative stressPathologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently there is no effective treatment for vascular dementia (VaD). Pharmacological treatment often lead to severe complications and require drug dosage adjustment. This study investigated the effect of scalp electroacupuncture combined with Memantine in VaD. The safety and antioxidative effect of scalp electroacupuncture were also explored.A retrospective study was conducted and data of inpatients of Linyi Central Hospital with VaD between June 2017 and May 2018 were collected and sorted. The patients were divided into scalp electroacupuncture-medication (A), scalp electroacupuncture (B) and medication (control) (C) groups, in which Memantine was prescribed as medication. Cognitive function, activities of daily living and quality of life assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Barthel index and dementia quality of life questionnaire; the contents of superoxide dismutase, lipid peroxide and nitric oxide in blood samples; and adverse reaction were compared.Data from a total of 150 patients were collected (Group A, n = 55; Group B, n = 50; Group C, n = 45). The post-treatment/follow-up Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Barthel index and dementia quality of life questionnaire scores were significantly improved in all groups compared to pre-treatment (groups A and B, P<.01; group C, P<.05). The improvements were significant for groups A vs C, B vs C (P<0.01, both), and group A vs B (P<.05). The post-treatment/follow-up levels of lipid peroxide and nitric oxide decreased significantly while superoxide dismutase increased significantly in groups A and B compared to pre-treatment (P<.01, both). The differences were significant for groups A vs C, and B vs C (P < .01, both), but not significant between groups A and B (P > .05). There were no significant adverse events occurred during the study and follow-up.In combined treatment, scalp electroacupuncture works in parallel with Memantine and significantly increase the therapeutic effect in VaD with no significant adverse events. Scalp electroacupuncture may have the potential to serve as an option or alternative treatment for VaD. Scalp electroacupuncture may alleviate VaD symptoms through its antioxidative mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207