MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049446215 · doi:10.1364/josaa.400805

Clarifications on the Gouy phase of radially polarized laser beams

2020· article· en· W3049446215 on OpenAlexafffund
Shanny Pelchat-Voyer, Michel Piché

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America A · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDiffractionOpticsPhase (matter)Electric fieldFocus (optics)PhysicsBeam (structure)Optical axisWave vectorField (mathematics)Laser beamsLaserQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gouy phase, which describes how a field accumulates an additional phase shift around the focus compared to a spherical wave, is investigated for the strongly focused T M 01 beam in free space. It is shown, using both analytical and numerical solutions, that when the effects of the edges of focusing optics are small, the complete variation of the on-axis Gouy phase of the longitudinal electric field is 2 π . It is true even in the strongly focused limit. Moreover, we show, using an appropriate effective wavevector, how to retrieve the Gouy phase when the diffraction caused by the edges is dominant at the focus. We further investigate the off-axis Gouy phase of the T M 01 beam and show that any slight variation from the optical axis causes a variation of the Gouy phase of the longitudinal electric field to reduce to π .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America ASame topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207