Community-based resource management in the Arctic: transformation caused by the changing environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The article outlines structural changes in the current environmental management and availability of biological resources for three Arctic indigenous communities are located in Yamal-Nenets Autonomous district (YaNAO), Nenets Autonomous district (NAO), and Canadian ethnic province Nunavut in conditions of extractive industry development and climate change. Special attention is given to factors leading transformations of quality of life of Nenets and Inuit are based on natural resources, playing a vital role for human habitats and supporting ecosystem services. Indigenous carry out a community-based natural resource management relating to their traditional way of life. This management is viewed as an effective tool supporting the Arctic biodiversity. Also it provides access to natural resources for present and growing generations both. Based on field research, statistical information, materials on environment transformation during on-going development of mineral and fuel deposits, reports on changing natural and climatic features, and on interview of a wide range of members of indigenous communities author indicates a modern picture of availability of biological resources for native peoples, reveals sustainability of the Arctic environment to technogenic impact and changing climate, proposes measures aimed at Nenets and Inuit livelihood protection, and at transfer of traditional land-based skills to future Northern generations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".