Why does age of onset predict clinical severity in schizophrenia? A multiplex extended pedigree study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Schizophrenia has substantial variation in symptom severity, course of illness, and overall functioning. Earlier age of onset (AOO) is consistently associated with negative outcomes and yet the causes of this association are still unknown. We used a multiplex, extended pedigree design (total N = 771; 636 relatives from 43 multigenerational families with at least 2 relatives diagnosed with schizophrenia and 135 matched controls) to examine among the schizophrenia relatives ( N = 103) the relationship between AOO and negative and positive symptom severity, cognition, and community functioning. Most importantly, we assessed whether there are shared genetic effects between AOO and negative symptoms, positive symptoms, cognition, and community functioning. As expected, earlier AOO was significantly correlated with increased severity of negative and positive symptoms and poorer cognition and community functioning among schizophrenia patients. Notably, the genetic correlation between AOO of schizophrenia and negative symptoms was significant ( R g = −1.00, p = .007). Although the genetic correlations between AOO and positive symptoms, cognition, and community functioning were estimated at maximum and in the predicted direction, they were not statistically significant. AOO of schizophrenia itself was modestly heritable, although not significant and negative symptoms, positive symptoms, and cognition were all strongly and significantly heritable. In sum, we replicated prior findings indicating that earlier AOO is associated with increased symptom severity and extended the literature by detecting shared genetic effects between AOO and negative symptoms, suggestive of pleiotropy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".