Fully automated deep learning based segmentation of normal, infarcted and edema regions from multiple cardiac MRI sequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myocardial characterization is essential for patients with myocardial infarction and other myocardial diseases, and the assessment is often performed using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) sequences. In this study, we propose a fully automated approach using deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) for cardiac pathology segmentation, including left ventricular (LV) blood pool, right ventricular blood pool, LV normal myocardium, LV myocardial edema (ME) and LV myocardial scars (MS). The input to the network consists of three CMR sequences, namely, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T2 and balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP). The proposed approach utilized the data provided by the MyoPS challenge hosted by MICCAI 2020 in conjunction with STACOM. The training set for the CNN model consists of images acquired from 25 cases, and the gold standard labels are provided by trained raters and validated by radiologists. The proposed approach introduces a data augmentation module, linear encoder and decoder module and a network module to increase the number of training samples and improve the prediction accuracy for LV ME and MS. The proposed approach is evaluated by the challenge organizers with a test set including 20 cases and achieves a mean dice score of $46.8\%$ for LV MS and $55.7\%$ for LV ME+MS
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".