Static liquefaction behaviour of gold mine tailings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Static liquefaction failure of tailings impoundments has been a persistent issue for the mining industry for many decades. In this study, the monotonic shearing response and instability of gold tailings are examined through a series of constant-volume and drained direct simple shear tests on slurry-deposited and moist-tamped specimens. The experiments were carried out on both the silt and the sand tailings produced at the mill and separated for use in dam construction. Laboratory shear wave velocity measurements made by means of bender element tests were also used to relate the shearing response and strength of the tailings to an in situ geophysical measurement. Specimen fabric differences produced by the different preparation methods do not translate into significant differences in the critical state line, liquefaction triggering or post-liquefaction strength for the sand tailings. Additionally, common trends of undrained yield and post-liquefaction strength ratios with state parameter were observed for both the sand and the silt tailings despite their different fines contents. An empirical method to evaluate the onset of instability and the post-liquefaction strength of the tailings using shear wave velocity is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".