3D UAV Trajectory Design and Frequency Band Allocation for Energy-Efficient and Fair Communication: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-assisted communication has drawn increasing attention recently. In this paper, we investigate 3D UAV trajectory design and band allocation problem considering both the UAV's energy consumption and the fairness among the ground users (GUs). Specifically, we first formulate the energy consumption model of a quad-rotor UAV as a function of the UAV's 3D movement. Then, based on the fairness and the total throughput, the fair throughput is defined and maximized within limited energy. We propose a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based algorithm, named as EEFC-TDBA (energy-efficient fair communication through trajectory design and band allocation) that chooses the state-of-the-art DRL algorithm, deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG), as its basis. EEFC-TDBA allows the UAV to: 1) adjust the flight speed and direction so as to enhance the energy efficiency and reach the destination before the energy is exhausted; and 2) allocate frequency band to achieve fair communication service. Simulation results are provided to demonstrate that EEFC-TDBA outperforms the baseline methods in terms of the fairness, the total throughput, as well as the minimum throughput.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".