LDE-aware Analog Layout Migration with OPC-inclusive Routing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Performance degradation in analog circuits due to layout dependent effects (LDEs) has become increasingly challenging in advanced technologies. To address this issue, LDEs have to be seriously considered as performance constraints in the physical design process. In this article, we have proposed an innovative LDE-aware retargeting methodology for analog layout migration from old technologies to new ones with LDEs optimized for performance preservation. The LDE constraints, which are first identified with the aid of a specialized sensitivity analysis scheme, are satisfied during the layout migration process. Moreover, optical proximity correction (OPC), as one of the most popular resolution enhancement techniques for subwavelength lithography in modern nanometer technology manufacturing, is also included in this study. We have developed an OPC-inclusive ILP-based analog router to route electrical nets for improving image fidelity of the final layout while the routability and other analog constraints are respected in the meantime. The experimental results show our proposed layout migration methodology along with the routing scheme is able to retarget analog layouts with better circuit performance and finer image quality compared to the previous works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it