METODOLOGÍA DE GESTIÓN INTEGRADA DE CALIDAD, AMBIENTE, SEGURIDAD Y SALUD EN EL TRABAJO, PARA LAS PYMES CONTRATISTAS DEL SECTOR ELÉCTRICO BASADA EN EL MODELO DE SISTEMA VIABLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se presenta una metodología para la integración de los sistemas de gestión en calidad, ambiente, seguridad y salud en el trabajo, aplicable a las pymes contratistas del sector eléctrico en Colombia, diseñada tomando como base los principios del Modelo de Sistemas Viables (MSV) propuesto por Stafford Beer, la cual permite el cumplimiento de la normatividad legal vigente en Colombia y las normas voluntarias: ISO: 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015 y OHSAS 18001:2007. En la investigación se validó la aplicación de un modelo de las teorías organizacionales como el MSV, para la integración de los sistemas de gestión, que reconoce en las empresas un único sistema de gestión que dará respuesta a los diferentes estándares normativos y legales, con enfoque sistémico y con una estructura permite a las pymes contratistas dar respuesta a las exigencias de un mercado cada vez más competitivo y exigente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".