MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W30553158 · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2018.12.002

The Modality Principle in Multimedia Learning An Open Question: When Speech Fails to Foster Learning? ∗

2007· article· en· W30553158 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Klaus D. Stiller

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModality (human–computer interaction)Cognitive loadInstructional designCognitionCognitive psychologyComputer scienceMultimediaLearning theoryPsychologyHuman–computer interactionNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Learning is fostered when spoken rather than written texts are used concurrently with dynamic or static pictures in instructional settings.This is mainly caused by split attention and can be explained by the cognitive theory of multimedia learning (Mayer, 2001) or the cognitive load theory (Sweller, 1999).Numerous studies have provided evidence for modality effects (Ginns, 2005), but recently, studies also revealed a vanishing or reversal of modality effects in favor of visual texts.This can be attributed to learner characteristics or instructional design, but knowledge about relevant features is still scarce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesFrench-language works237,207