Anomalous Topography, Bathymetry, Crust and Mantle in the North Atlantic Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The whole North Atlantic region has highly anomalous topography and bathymetry. Observations show evidence for substantial topographic change with rapid onshore uplift close to the Atlantic coast and simultaneous subsidence of basins on the continental shelves, most likely throughout the Mesozoic. We present a review of geophysical data and interpretation of the whole region with emphasis on data relevant for assessing topographic change. We review the available data on topography, bathymetry, density, seismic velocity, and heat flow and present interpretations of the structure and composition of the crust and lithospheric mantle. We find that most of the northern North Atlantic Ocean has anomalously shallow bathymetry although it follows the “normal” square-root-of-age dependence, which however is elevated by up-to 2 km. The heat flow variation follows the square-root-of-age dependence, although heat flow is anomalously low on the spreading ridges around and on Iceland. In apparent contrast, exceptionally low seismic velocities are observed along the spreading ridges around and below Iceland. Near-zero free-air gravity anomalies indicate that the oceanic areas are mainly in isostatic equilibrium, whereas anomalously low Bouguer anomalies indicate low density in the uppermost mantle. Anomalously thick oceanic crust is observed along the Greenland-Iceland-Faro Ridge and extending into the Davis Strait. We propose that the anomalous bathymetry is caused by compositional variation in the lithosphere, which indicates that the lithosphere in the ocean may include remnants of continental lithosphere. The onshore circum-Atlantic areas show rapid uplift close to the coast with rates up-to 3 cm/yr. This is surprisingly associated with strong positive free-air gravity anomalies which predicts isostatic subsidence. However, negative free-air gravity anomalies in onshore Canada and Bothnian Bay explain recent uplift in the shields as isostatic rebound after glaciation. Archaean lithosphere is everywhere thick in both Greenland and Fennoscandia, Proterozoic areas have thinner lithosphere and Palaeozoic-Mesozoic areas have very thin lithosphere. It is enigmatic that the presumed Archaean-Proterozoic Barents Sea region is submerged and includes deep sedimentary basins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".