MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3059811046 · doi:10.1201/9780429292798-16

Commercially Successful Books for Place-Based Geology: Roadside Geology Covers the US

2020· book-chapter· en· W3059811046 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William D. Witherspoon, John Rimel

Bibliographic record

VenueApple Academic Press eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyArchaeologyMining engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Roadside Geology series from Mountain Press Publishing (MPP) has profoundly improved access to geology for travelers in North America. Over one million copies have connected places to Earth science concepts for readers, many of whom have little or no formal background in geology. The books, widely available in parks, museums, and on the shelves of both independent and large chain booksellers, now cover 38 US states and part of Canada. The format is characterized by concise introductions to concepts, end-to-end road guides for major highways within each geologic region, and road guide geologic maps with arrows marking outstanding features. All books since 2010 are in full color, which enhances both their visual appeal and the usefulness of the road guide maps. The eight-year process to prepare Roadside Geology of Georgia typifies the effort that goes into each volume in the series. Its authors learned to give readers just enough information to understand what is most interesting about a feature, rather than a systematic textbook. MPP staff helped improve conciseness, as well as clarity for non-geologists. The local expertise of six geologist reviewers helped to insure accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2890.222

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApple Academic Press eBooksSame topicGeotourism and Geoheritage ConservationFrench-language works237,207