Flower morphogenesis and gametophyte fertility attest to the rare condition of gynomonoecy in <i>Parietaria debilis</i> (Urticaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parietaria debilis G. Forst. is gynomonoecious, which is a rare condition in the Urticaceae family and among angiosperms. Apetalous flowers of two different morph types (monoclinous, pistillate) occur in the same inflorescence and are reduced in size and in the number of whorls and of organs per whorl. The objective of this study was to compare the morphogenesis of monoclinous and pistillate flowers to determine whether the monoclinous flowers produce fertile gametophytes, and elucidate the pathways leading to the absence of stamens and to the changes in number of whorls and organs per whorl. Flower buds and flowers (non-fertilized, fertilized) were processed for surface and anatomical studies. Pollen ultrastructure and viability were determined. Inflorescences with fertilized flowers were checked for the presence and location of fruits/viable seeds. The monoclinous flower has four sepals, four stamens, and a uniovulate pseudomonomerous gynoecium. In the pistillate flower, the stamens are absent or, rarely, aborted. No petals are formed. The gynoecium is pseudomonomerous, originated as a central primordium that differentiates into two carpels, but only one develops and houses an ovule. Monoclinous and pistillate flowers produce viable seeds. Thus, our data confirmed that this species is indeed gynomonoecious.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".