MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3061823551 · doi:10.1109/sdpc.2019.00106

A Smart Monitoring System for Rotor Bar Fault Detection in Induction Motors

2019· article· en· W3061823551 on OpenAlexaff
Manzar Mahmud, Aman Shukla, Wilson Wang

Bibliographic record

Venue2019 International Conference on Sensing, Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Control (SDPC) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHilbert–Huang transformRotor (electric)Fault (geology)Induction motorFault detection and isolationBar (unit)EngineeringComputer scienceData acquisitionElectronic engineeringAutomotive engineeringActuatorElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reliable induction motor (IM) fault detection techniques are very useful in industries to diagnose IM defects and improve operational performance. A smart sensor-based empirical mode decomposition (EMD) technology is proposed in this paper for rotor bar fault detection in IMs. A smart current sensor system is developed for wireless data acquisition, allowing for low-cost, low space footprint, and non-invasive installation. The characteristic fault frequency will change with the variation of load/speed/fault severity. The basis of this EMD technique is lying on the correlation of fault features over different frequency bands and intrinsic mode functions, especially under light load conditions. The effectiveness of the proposed EMD technique is verified by experimental tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2019 International Conference on Sensing, Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Control (SDPC)Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207