MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3061909850 · doi:10.14288/1.0392794

Development of the Canadian agri-food lifecycle data centre with data format interoperability requirements

2020· article· en· W3061909850 on OpenAlex
Matthew Fritter

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Supply Chain Traceability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteroperabilityComputer scienceBusinessDatabaseProcess managementWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The field of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) models the resource flows and emissions characteristic of real-world industrial, agricultural, and economic activities through the use of Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) datasets. As the amount of data available to LCA practitioners through national and commercial database initiatives increases, there have been growing concerns within the LCA community regarding the interoperability of LCI data. Choice of data format and nomenclature poses problems for re-usability, as a dataset may not cleanly integrate into an LCA model due to differences in nomenclature, or a practitioner’s LCA software may simply not recognize the format type. This interoperability has been identified as one of the largest problems, along with data availability, in the LCA field. The focus of this research was the development of a new national Life Cycle Inventory database: The Canadian Agri-food Life Cycle Data Center (CALDC), which will serve as a central repository for Canadian agri-food data. During the course of the research, information was solicited from existing LCA database providers to inform development, and potential solutions for the interoperability issues were researched and implemented within the CALDC. The development included a searchable public database repository, as well as a web application that allows users to create, modify, and publish new LCI datasets, known as SimpLCIty. A set of recommendations were drafted for new LCI database initiatives, with the goal of increasing the interoperability between databases and datasets and increasing the availability of data. These recommendations were used in the development of the CALDC, and also present potential future avenues for expansion and development, such as the implementation of Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) or the re-distribution of datasets through third-party data providers and initiatives. The Canadian Agri-food Life Cycle Data Centre is now live, and is currently being used by researchers at both UBC and external stakeholder partners such as the Canadian Roundtable for Sustainable Beef (CRSB) to create and publish new publicly available agri-food data for LCA research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it