Coupled Flow/Geomechanics Modeling of Interfracture Water Injection To Enhance Oil Recovery in Tight Reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Unconventional tight reservoirs that are typically characterized by low permeability and low porosity have contributed significantly to the global hydrocarbon production in recent years. Although hydraulic fracturing, along with horizontal well drilling, enables the economic development of such reservoirs, the production rate often declines sharply and results in low primary hydrocarbon recovery. The application of enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) techniques in tight reservoirs has received much interest. In this study, the feasibility and efficiency of interfracture water injection to enhance oil recovery in multistage fractured tight oil reservoirs are analyzed through an efficient coupled flow/geomechanics model with an embedded discrete-fracture model (EDFM). A combined finite-volume/finite-element scheme is used to discretize the governing equations for flow and geomechanics, and the coupled problem is solved sequentially using a fixed-stress splitting algorithm. A basic numerical model consisting of a 15-stage fractured horizontal well is constructed using the petrophysical and geomechanical properties of a tight oil formation in Ordos Basin, China. Fractures indexed with even numbers are switched into injecting fractures when the production rate has dropped to less than a certain threshold. The improvement of oil recovery is analyzed by comparing the production profiles with and without water injection. In this coupled model, the fracture closure/opening during production/injection is considered according to the constitutive relations between fracture aperture and effective normal stress acting on the fracture faces. The poromechanical response of matrix is modeled by the Biot (1941) theory. The effects of fracture spacing, injection rate, and the presence of a natural-fracture network on oil-recovery enhancement are discussed through sensitivity analysis. The main mechanisms of interfracture water injection for enhancing oil recovery are waterflooding and reservoir-pressure maintenance. Small fracture spacing tends to reduce the oil recovery because of fracture interference and a limited drainage area; therefore, the primary depletion stage is shortened as the fracture spacing is reduced. The influence of interfracture water injection is more pronounced with smaller fracture spacing because the pressure-transient responses near the producing fractures are more dramatic considering the close proximity between the injecting fracture and the producing fracture. Although a higher injection rate results in higher oil recovery, the injectivity in low-permeability reservoirs limits the maximum-allowable injection rate. When secondary (natural)-fracture networks are considered, neighboring hydraulic fractures can be connected to one another via the secondary fractures, particularly if the interfracture spacing is small. Water can break through in the producing fractures quickly, which could also lead to high water cut and suboptimal oil-recovery performance. This study tests the feasibility and efficiency of interfracture injection to enhance tight oil recovery. The results indicate that interfracture injection can be a promising EOR technique for tight oil reservoirs, which sheds lights on future completion strategies and production design in tight reservoirs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".