41 Fostering Hope: The Comprehensive Accessible care for Infants with Neonatal abstinence (CAIN) Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction/Background Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) occurs in newborns exposed to drugs in-utero. In Canada, maternal opiate use in pregnancy has been steadily rising resulting in as many as 1850 babies born with NAS per year. Management of babies born with NAS requires supportive, interdisciplinary care. Depending on the severity of NAS, babies may be cared for with non-pharmacological interventions or some may need to be admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for extended hospital stays to receive medication and management of ongoing complex health care needs. Hospital and community health care providers have expressed concerns around the continuity of care for these babies in their stay in hospital and their transition to home. Objectives This study examined the experiences of hospital and community-based health care providers and families regarding the management of babies with NAS. The driving force behind our inquiry related to our interest in streamlining care for these babies in highly complex health and social systems. Design/Methods In total, 47 interdisciplinary participants were interviewed over a four-month period with individuals from Women’s and Child Health, Community, and family members. Interviewed transcripts were reviewed over several months and were completed in December 2019 using an inductive thematic analysis which culminated in the identification of an overarching theme linked with primary themes. Results The study identified existing gaps in the management of these patients, determined how to improve communication between hospital and community networks, and provided a better understanding of the attitudes, perceptions and experiences of hospital and community personnel. The overarching theme identified was hope, with the primary themes being: system, mental health, mother/baby, judgement, and knowledge (see Figure 1). Several gaps identified in the system included fear, stigma, and language. Certain solutions proposed for improvement included focused care in a rooming in model for the mother and baby dyad, supporting mothers’ well-being, involving mothers and families, and supporting care providers in a family centered care model. In Figure 1, green lines indicate themes that are linked with and support hope, and red lines indicate themes that are barriers to hope. Conclusion This research demonstrates that programs and interventions implemented when working with mothers and babies with NAS must foster hope in mothers, families, and in the extended care provider team.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".