Efficacy of 4% tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (T-EDTA) catheter lock solution in home parenteral nutrition patients: A quality improvement evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: A functioning and reliable central venous access device is fundamental for home parenteral nutrition patients to administer essential nutrition. Complications of central venous access devices including occlusion, microbial colonization, and biofilm formation are problematic and sometimes life-threatening. A novel lock solution, 4% tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, has properties that may reduce such complications. Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the safety, efficacy, and cost implications of implementing 4% tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid to prevent catheter-related complications in home parenteral nutrition patients. Methods: A pre- and post-intervention study was carried over 36 months (12 months pre; 24 months post) by the British Columbia Home Parenteral Nutrition Program in Vancouver, Canada, where 4% tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was implemented for patients at high risk for central venous access device occlusion and catheter-related infection. Patients were included in the study if they had previous central venous access device complications. The outcomes evaluated were central line-associated bloodstream infection, catheter occlusion requiring thrombolytic treatment, and catheter replacements. Results: In total, 22 out of 105 patients met the inclusion criteria. Two patients were excluded from analyses due to non-adherence and concomitant use of other lock solutions. Post intervention, 20 home parenteral nutrition patients experienced significant reduction in the central line-associated bloodstream infection rate (pre = 1.918/1000 catheter days; post = 0.563/1000 catheter days; p = 0.04) There were no occlusion events reported post intervention. Conclusion: For home parenteral nutrition patients, 4% tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid lock solution effectively reduces the risk of central venous access device complications including occlusions and catheter-related infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".