MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W306930109 · doi:10.4000/lisa.8202

Post-Crisis Anglo-Saxon Capitalism

2015· article· en· W306930109 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher John Nock, Catherine Coron

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue LISA / LISA e-journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policy and Reform Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapitalismAnglo saxonPoliticsFinancial crisisEconomicsPolitical economyEconomic historyPolitical scienceEconomyHistoryMacroeconomicsLawClassics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In France, the label “Anglo-Saxon capitalism” has tended to suggest an intimate link between the U.K. economic model and that of the United States of America. This link is thought to run much deeper than mere economics. It includes linguistic and cultural ties that distinguish a broad-based Anglo-Saxon socio-economic and political model from the French and other models. This paper first considers to what extent a distinctive Anglo-Saxon economic model can be identified. It then considers U.K. and U.S. responses to the 2008-2009 financial and economic crisis to determine if they are sufficiently similar to support ongoing reference to an Anglo-Saxon economic model. The final part considers the extent to which the pre-crisis Anglo-Saxon model contributed to the recent crisis of global capitalism, and whether Anglo-American capitalism has actually come out of the ruins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue LISA / LISA e-journalSame topicSocial Policy and Reform StudiesFrench-language works237,207