MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W307219551

Two Toronto Novels and Lessons of Belonging: The Global City in Modern Canadian Literature

2008· article· en· W307219551 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Myles Chilton

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in the literary imagination · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryOrder (exchange)ApartmentAlleyWildernessSociologyMedia studiesLawArt historyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Russell Smith's 1994 novel How Insensitive momentarily pulls its protagonist out of the city to reveal what is different about life in the hinterlands. On his way to a nightclub in the north end of Toronto, Ted Owen finds himself for the first time beyond the reach of the subway system. The walk north from the terminal station takes him into a sterile streetscape of closed specialty food shops streetlights extending in a perfectly straight line for miles, disappearing over the horizon. Alienated by this taste of near-wilderness, Ted suddenly notices his dress: he has brought a trench coat because Some voice from his childhood had told him he might be cold. The trench coat, he concludes, is absolutely inappropriate for the suit. But his sudden self-consciousness is expressed not only in terms of space, fashion, or the triggering of a childhood memory. In his rush to leave his apartment he has forgotten his watch. Frantically he searches the tops of buildings for a time There was none, continues the narrator, and he cursed the inadequacy of the street. In a real city, one would always be in sight of a pixelboard (94). (1) When he finally gets to the nightclub, Ted is stuck on the lack of a time The following dialogue ensues, it is worth quoting at length in order to understand that the lack of a is no mere inconvenience. Ted says to a friend: Do you know ... on my way here I was looking for a display, you know the ones on the tops of buildings in the subway, to check the time, when I couldn't see one I was actually irritated? I mean we've come to expect that every street has one somewhere. Fully, said Andreas, pouring wine inaccurately. I realized that a mere two years ago I would never have expected them on any street, much less desired them, even less been embarrassed by their absence. I mean it felt strangely provincial. I've come to feel that in a real city you'd always be in sight of a time display. Andreas laughed. the temperature. Exactly. And preferably with a constant stock ticker running, so one can keep track of New York prices. And when the New York exchange shuts down, at night, it would switch over to Tokyo prices. At least that way we'd all have some sense of being connected , I mean you wouldn't feel this awful dislocation that you feel up in deserted suburban areas like this. I feel so inhuman up here. (97) Ted Owen wants to feel as though he is in a real city in order to overcome the provinciality of the hinterlands. But what is more striking about Ted's attitude is the way in which he believes that Toronto qualifies as a real city: it does not have to be the source center of Canadianness, or even the nerve center of the Canadian economy; it qualifies by being connected to New York Tokyo. In other words, Ted is signaling how a global city (2) like Toronto becomes a site of identity-formation that codifies itself as a global urban consciousness, fluent in a transnational discourse of signs, values, knowledge. Through Ted's identification with foreign cities, themselves materialized in the abstract value of stock prices, How Insensitive serves as a case study of how fictional representations of the global city-hess of Toronto produce an ideological break in the history of English Canadian literature. By programmatically transforming Canadian literary nationalism's traditional anti-urbanism into a rearticulation of the relationship between the nation-state its global cities, Ted signals that the relationship between land national identity is historically past, that new, ahistorical urban structures of feeling are taking its place. Perhaps the best way to illustrate why the wholly urban cosmopolitanism represented in How Insensitive is significant is to contrast it with the anti-urbanism implicit in another novel that deals with Toronto's transformation into a global city. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in the literary imaginationSame topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207