MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3073394378 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaa068.057

58 Overweight and obesity in children with autism spectrum disorder: Findings from primary care electronic medical records

2020· article· en· W3073394378 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laura M. Kinlin, Sarah Carsley, Charles Keown‐Stoneman, Natasha Saunders, Karen Tu, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Catherine S. Birken

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoPublic Health OntarioHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverweightMedicineBody mass indexAutism spectrum disorderOdds ratioConfidence intervalMedical recordObesityPediatricsLogistic regressionDemographyAutismPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction/Background Paediatric overweight and obesity are important public health problems worldwide. Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may be at increased risk compared to their typically-developing peers; however, prevalence estimates in ASD have varied widely and existing studies have largely been limited by use of an external comparison group. Objectives To compare prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and youth (<19 years of age) with and without ASD, using electronic medical record data from paediatric primary care visits. Design/Methods This was a cross-sectional analysis of EMRPC (Electronic Medical Records Primary Care) data, representing 385 family physicians in 43 clinics in Ontario, Canada. Age- and sex-standardized body mass index (BMI) z-scores were calculated using abstracted heights and weights from the most recent visit between January 2011 and December 2015. Weight status was determined using World Health Organization growth reference standards. ASD was defined using a previously-validated algorithm in EMRPC, based on an ASD-related term in the ‘Cumulative Patient Profile.’ Chi-square test statistics and multinomial logistic regression were used to compare weight status of those with and without ASD. Results In total, 44,625 children and youth were included, 632 [1.42%] with ASD. Distribution of weight status was significantly different between those with and without ASD (p<0.001) [Table 1]. Compared to their typically-developing peers, children with ASD had significantly higher odds of overweight (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-1.87), obesity (unadjusted OR 2.55 (2.00-3.26) and severe obesity (unadjusted OR 3.09; 95% CI 2.08-4.60); these associations persisted after adjusting for sex, age, neighborhood income quintile and rural residence (Table 2). Conclusion Data from a large primary care database suggest that children with ASD are at substantially increased risk of overweight, obesity and severe obesity. Findings support the need for anticipatory guidance, prevention and management strategies specific to this clinical population. Future work will aim to better understand at what age differences in weight status emerge, and what nutritional, behavioural, or medical factors differentially affect weight status in the ASD population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFrench-language works237,207