MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W307600206 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v38i2.1691

Dark Ambivalence: Resurgent Stereotypes of Afro-Cuban Masculinity

2014· article· es· W307600206 on OpenAlexaffvenue
David Lisenby

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCuban History and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtMasculinityGender studiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el contexto de la Cuba pos-soviética, cuando el incremento del turismo internacional a la isla a partir de los años 90 ha conllevado una explosión de la industria del sexo, las novelas Los palacios distantes (2002), de Abilio Estévez, y El Rey de la Habana (1999), de Pedro Juan Gutiérrez, construyen personajes que se aproximan al perfil del trabajador sexual masculino con tendencias violentas. La caracterización estereotípica del hombre negro como hiperviril y violento encuentra sus precursores en la sociedad esclavista. Este artículo analiza la ambivalencia en las representaciones de la masculinidad afrocubana en las novelas de Estévez y Gutiérrez, en las que la presentación crítica de los estereotipos perjudiciales se ve complicada por la relación entre la producción cultural cubana y el mercado internacional que la consume. En estas novelas, y en otras obras referidas aquí, se observa la cosificación sexuada del cuerpo varonil afrocubano como un agente deviolencia que combate prácticas sociales discriminatorias, a la vez que evidencia la perduración de las mismas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.016
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicCuban History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207