MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3076819833 · doi:10.1201/9781003077633-5

Studies on decapod crustaceans of the Pacific coast of the United States and Canada

2020· book-chapter· en· W3076819833 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John S. Garth, Mary K. Wicksten

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrustaceanOceanographyFisheryGeographyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The California Academy of Sciences and other scientific institutions received many specimens from amateur naturalists along the coast. Dr. Henry Hemphill of San Diego was an enthusiastic collector of mollusks and crustaceans at the turn of the century. Percy S. Bamhart, director of the Venice Marine Biological Station, the forerunner of the marine science center of the University of Southern California, was a particularly active collector who sent specimens from the coasts of Los Angeles and Orange counties as well as Santa Catalina Island. The most extensive collecting efforts prior to World War II were those of the Velero HI, sponsored by Captain G. Allan Hancock and involving biologists from the University of Southern California and the Smithsonian Institution. M. K. Wicksten, who studied under J. S. Garth at the University of Southern California, examined specimens at the Allan Hancock Foundation and the Smithsonian Institution and included them in accounts of the caridean faunas of the Gulf of California and Galapagos Islands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207