MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3077313041 · doi:10.1002/gj.3951

Tectono‐geomorphic evolution of Harlik Mountain in the Eastern Tian Shan, insight from thermochronological data and geomorphic analysis

2020· article· en· W3077313041 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersChina Geological SurveyChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsThermochronologyGeologyDenudationCretaceousCenozoicTectonicsMountain range (options)MesozoicPaleontologyFault (geology)Mountain formationTectonic upliftGeomorphologySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Harlik Mountain is in the easternmost part of the Tian Shan and is a prime example of an intracontinental orogenic belt. Several studies have used low‐temperature thermochronology to understand the uplift history of this range. However, complicated structures have a profound impact on the study of the tectonic evolution of the Harlik Mountain during the Mesozoic‐Cenozoic. Here, we refine the structural characteristics of the Harlik Mountain and then acquire the detailed thermal histories in different parts of the range. Through field observations, we demonstrate that the brittle Harlik Fault experienced two activities, including early normal faulting and late right‐lateral strike‐slip normal faulting. In particular, geomorphic and river analyses indicate that the topography of the Harlik Mountain was significantly influenced by faults. Combined with the thermochronological data from previous studies, thermal history modelling based on our new data on the Harlik Mountain suggest three fast cooling phases in the 128–110 Ma, 70–55 Ma, and 50–35 Ma. The first and the third cooling phases were associated with fault activities and the second cooling phase was related to regional denudation. The first phase of faulting, in the late Early Cretaceous, may be caused by stress relaxation after the Cimmerian collision. The second phase of faulting was likely to relate to local stress adjustment from the India‐Eurasia collision during the Eocene to Oligocene. Moreover, Late Cretaceous to Palaeocene regional cooling was probably affected by the collision of the Karakoram Block with Eurasia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it