تاریخ مختصر ل مسجد القاضى برکات بحارة الیهود بالقاهرة A Short History of Al-Kādi Barakāt mousque, in the Jewish quarter, Cairo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
یعد مسجد القاضى برکات بحارة الیهود بالقاهرة أحد المعالم الرئیسیة بذلک الحى ذو التاریخ الطویل مع الیهود؛ بالرغم منالظروف السیئة التى شهدها هذا المسجد والتى أدت إلى إهماله من قبل وزارتى الآثار-)وقتها کانت لجنة حفظ الآثار العربیة(والأوقاف؛ والتى بالفعل أطاحت بالقیمة الأثریة المادیة للمسجد ولکن الحقیقة التاریخیة لهذا المسجد لا یمکن إنکارها؛ حتى فى- حالة الإهمال والتعتیم تلک؛ فالمسجد لیس صنیعة التغیر الدیموغرافى لسکان حارة الیهود؛ عندما تحول الحى خلال أعوام 65916511 ؛ وبسبب ظروف الحرب؛ لحى ذو أغلبیة مسلمة؛ على عکس ما کان قدیما ذو أغلبیة یهودیة؛ بل کان یمکن القول أنهمرکز الطائفة الیهودیة فى مصر حتى نهایة القرن التاسع عشر..ولکن هذا المسجد وکما أظهرت الدراسة یعود تاریخ تشییده لسنوات قلیلة قبیل الفتح العثمانى لمصر- حوالى عام 6955 م؛وهو ما یدحض تماما التاریخ الإسرائیلى المزیف للمسجد؛ شکل وجود هذا المسجد فى حارة الیهود حالة فریدة وغریبة من نوعها؛انتهت بخرابه فى ظروف وملابسات غیر معروفه؛ هذا الخراب وفقا لتقریر لجنة حفظ الآثار العربیة عام 6715 ؛ لم یکن بالشکلالکبیر الذى یحول دون استعادته مثل باقى مساجد ومعالم القاهرة التاریخیة التى تم ترمیمها؛ ولکن اللجنة آثرت ترک المهمة علىکاهل نظارة الأوقاف التى أهملت المسجد ربما طوال آکثر من قرن؛ ومع التغیر الدیمغرافى للحى؛ تحرک الأهالى فى أعمالترمیم أضاعت کامل التاریخ الآثرى للمسجد؛ ومع ذلک؛ فإن القیمة التاریخیة لهذا المسجد؛ یمکن على الأقل السعى فى الحفاظعلیها ولو على المستوى النظرى والأکادیمى؛ باعتباره جزء عزیز من تاریخ مصر؛ و هکذا تأتى هذه الدراسة کأول خطوة فىرحلة الکشف عن التاریخ الضائع أو )المنسى( لمسجد القاضى برکات فى حارة الیهود؛ عن طریق توظیف کل المصادر التاریخیةالمتاحة؛ فى بناء ثبت تاریخى أو سجل زمنى للمسجد؛ منذ وقت تشییده حتى الوقت الراهن. Mosque Al-Qadi Barakat in the Jewish quarter in Cairo; -Harat al-yahoud considered to be one of that Jewish neighbor's most famous monuments, although the history of that mosque cannot be counted as lucky one for it been neglected for a long time by ministry of Waqfs and comity of reserving Arab monuments, and as a result, the historical physical value of that mosque had been lost, but the legacy of the mosque cannot be denied even in this un-fortunes circumstance, the mosque cannot be attributed according to society change pattern in the Jewish quarter which transformed to be presented with the majority of inhabitances are Muslims during the time 1956-1967 during the years of the arab0 Israel war, and before that time it was almost a Jewish open Ghetto, conceder to be the center of Carnie's Jew for many centuries.But as this historical study had been document, the construction date of the mosque go back to the year 1499, which Prove that the Israelian historians had presented false history of that mosque, being a mosque in the middle of Jewish quarter was a unique situation for almost 300years ended by a great collapse in strange and un-known circumstance, according to comity of reserving Arab monuments' report in 1879 the mosque was almost in a good condition with a small amount of restoration work in-need, but the comity gave that mission to Ministry of Waqfs which ignored it for almost one century, later on with the help of Muslim inhabitants the mosque had been restored with a form and a plan far from its historical origins. even this is a real state case, those historical origins can be restored on theoretical and academicals level according to the important value of that mosque as part of Egyptian history, this study deal with documenting the history of the mosque from the year 1499 till the modern time as a 1st step in regaining the lost monument.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.033 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".