MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3080073809 · doi:10.1109/tccn.2020.3018157

Dynamic Resource Scaling for VNF Over Nonstationary Traffic: A Learning Approach

2020· article· en· W3080073809 on OpenAlexafffund
Kaige Qu, Weihua Zhuang, Xuemin Shen, Xu Li, Jaya Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceProvisioningQuality of serviceResource allocationScalabilityComputer networkSoftware-defined networkingMarkov decision processMarkov processTraffic generation modelDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Software defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV) are key enablers for service-level customized network slicing in fifth generation (5G) core networks. Network slices are required to be isolated from each other in terms of service performance with traffic load fluctuations. In this article, the virtual network function (VNF) scalability issue is studied to meet the quality-of-service (QoS) requirement in the presence of nonstationary traffic, through joint VNF migration and resource scaling. A traffic parameter learning method based on change point detection and Gaussian process regression (GPR) is proposed, to learn traffic parameters in a fractional Brownian motion (fBm) traffic model for each stationary traffic segment within a nonstationary traffic trace. Then, the time-varying VNF resource demand is predicted from the learned traffic parameters based on an fBm resource provisioning model. With the detected change points and predicted resource demands, a VNF migration problem is formulated as a Markov decision process (MDP) with variable-length decision epochs, to maximize the long-term reward integrating load balancing, migration cost, and resource overloading penalty. A penalty-aware deep Q-learning algorithm is proposed to incorporate awareness of resource overloading penalty, with improved performance over benchmarks in terms of training loss reduction and cumulative reward maximization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and NetworkingSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207