MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pemberian Hak Guna Usaha di Atas Tanah Hak Komunal Menurut Hukum Pertanahan di Indonesia

2020· article· en· W3080126457 on OpenAlexaff
Ni Ketut Krismanika, I Putu Gede Seputra, Luh Putu Suryani

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Interpretasi Hukum · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLand lawLawIndigenousCommunal landDecreePolitical scienceLand tenureCertificateOfficerIndigenous rightsPublic administrationHuman rightsGeographyAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The granting of Communal Rights Certificates is done according to Article 18 of the MATR / KBPN regulation No. 10/2016, if it has been decided that by the Governor, the Regent / Mayor in that place there are indeed indigenous peoples, the Officer will report to the Ministry of National Land Agency (hereinafter abbreviated as BPN) so that it is not changed and the registration of Communal Rights for the land contained therein in that area. This study aims to determine the mechanism for granting communal land rights certificates for customary law associations and also to identify tenure rights with communal rights based on agrarian arrangements. This research is a normative legal research with a statutory approach and analysis approach and legal concepts. The results of this study indicate that the Decree of the Minister of Land said that if the results of the research there were indigenous peoples and their land, the inauguration of the indigenous peoples was decided by the ministry of MATR / BPN of the region to determine and register communal rights over their land in the region's BPN. The communal rights being applied for will be issued in the future the communal rights certificate of the customary law community. After the Communal Rights Certificate is issued from the BPN on behalf of the customary community, the use and use can be cooperated with a third party, in this case if there is a party who is applying for a Cultivation Right on the communal right, then the customary law community may negotiate with the applicant, in order to get the same benefits. The conclusion is that the mechanism for granting communal land rights certificates to customary law associations starts from the report of the customary head to the Regent / Mayor and the granting of Building Use Rights on Communal Rights land is allowed as long as Communal Rights as long as the customary community wants to relinquish these rights or exchange with other land.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Interpretasi HukumSame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207