John K. Noyes. Herder: Aesthetics Against Imperialism. Toronto: the U of Toronto P, 2015. 402 Pp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In his helpful introduction, John K. Noyes gives an astute account of cultural history during Herder's time in order to document a growing awareness of the various dimensions of globalization and the development of an anti-imperialist aesthetics. He argues that “although Herder does not use the word imperialism, it is clear that he talks about what Christopher Bayly calls the ‘first age of global imperialism,’ beginning around 1760—that is, around the time Herder started to write.” Noyes also draws from theoretical works by Dimas Figueroa on the three structural conditions that make globalization possible, from Immanuel Wallerstein's description of “the second era of the great expansion of the capitalist world economy,” and from Reinhard Koselleck's 1959 Kritik und Krise with the observation that “in the eighteenth century, the modern subject became increasingly defined as encompassing all of humanity,” and that its “field of action was the unitary world of the globe.” Noyes emphasizes that Herder followed the latest discoveries by James Cook and Georg Forster, and explains how “the changing picture of the world and its inhabitants,” due to many scientific advances in geography, biology, ethnography, and anthropology, made the world then more imaginable as a whole, but also less imaginable, considering its infinite complexity, arguing that Herder considered “the threats which unchecked commercialism posed to the global environment—whether we take this as an environment of cultural and linguistic diversity, or that of biodiversity.” Noyes maintains that Herder's writings can be interpreted as “an ongoing exercise in crisis management related directly to globalization.” While Herder's writings are replete with many interesting and sometimes conflicting observations, Noyes has a talent for making even Herder's most speculative ideas appear to be logical, philosophically stringent, and grounded on materiality and cultural study. Noyes discusses how contemporaneous developments, in terms of globalization, made Herder aware of “the Atlantic slave trade and the decimation of the indigenous population throughout the New World,” which he clearly condemned. As Noyes clarifies, Herder also opposed such “ideas as the superiority of European civilization, the primacy of reason, and the progress of humankind,” while drawing attention to more complex notions that defy any simplistic interpretation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".