Lower Nitrogen Availability Enhances Resistance to Whiteflies in Tomato
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soil nitrogen (N) supplementation via fertilizers may increase crop yields substantially. However, by increasing tissue N content, added N can make plants more attractive to herbivores, effectively reducing their resistance to herbivores (ability to avoid herbivore damage). In turn, greater pest infestation may cause more severe reductions in fruit production than a moderate N scarcity. In this study, we tested whether lower N supplementation results in greater resistance to whiteflies and lower fruit production in four tomato varieties. We assessed the effects of N availability on tolerance to herbivores (degree to which fitness is affected by damage) and tested for the long-hypothesized trade-off between resistance and tolerance. Plants grown at half of an agronomically recommended amount of N had greater resistance without a significant drop in fruit production. Tomato varieties differed in resistance and tolerance to whiteflies, and showed a clear trade-off between these modes of defense. Root:shoot ratios were greater at lower N, but had no clear relation to tolerance. We estimated that the economic benefit of decreasing N addition almost fully compensates for losses due to lower tomato production. Additionally, lower fertilization rates would contribute to reduce environmental costs of large-scale use of agrochemicals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".